<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Montyspam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wpmututorials.com/news/montyspam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wpmututorials.com/news/montyspam/</link>
	<description>WordPress multisite how to - making sense of the network feature from what was wordpress mu</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliticalBear</title>
		<link>http://wpmututorials.com/news/montyspam/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliticalBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmututorials.com/news/montyspam/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>I have been waiting for this.

However, now I am unsure about whether I want to use it.  First, Monty checks back with his creator every once in awhile for updates.......huh...I want it to work on my server.....I don&#039;t want it talking to any other server without me....that is cheating. Second, on the site he says that this release is only good for a couple of months and then he might start charging (he uses &quot;donation&quot; like a threat).  Third, if it is just for comment spam....then I am okay. I receive ghetto trackbacks........but with my quality articles I would be mad if some spammer wasn&#039;t copying my material.....at least they are linking back. Fourth, it is still in beta.....and I only have one site up- it is my baby. Lastly, I am still new at this, so I believe caution is the best way.

May I ask what the ever so knowledgeable Andrea would suggest?

Other than that, I am sure a lot of quality work went into Monty and it sounds like it can revolutionize WPMU installations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been waiting for this.</p>
<p>However, now I am unsure about whether I want to use it.  First, Monty checks back with his creator every once in awhile for updates&#8230;&#8230;.huh&#8230;I want it to work on my server&#8230;..I don&#8217;t want it talking to any other server without me&#8230;.that is cheating. Second, on the site he says that this release is only good for a couple of months and then he might start charging (he uses &#8220;donation&#8221; like a threat).  Third, if it is just for comment spam&#8230;.then I am okay. I receive ghetto trackbacks&#8230;&#8230;..but with my quality articles I would be mad if some spammer wasn&#8217;t copying my material&#8230;..at least they are linking back. Fourth, it is still in beta&#8230;..and I only have one site up- it is my baby. Lastly, I am still new at this, so I believe caution is the best way.</p>
<p>May I ask what the ever so knowledgeable Andrea would suggest?</p>
<p>Other than that, I am sure a lot of quality work went into Monty and it sounds like it can revolutionize WPMU installations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

