<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Community Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wpmututorials.com/hacks/community-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wpmututorials.com/hacks/community-service/</link>
	<description>WordPress multisite how to - making sense of the network feature from what was wordpress mu</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Turner</title>
		<link>http://wpmututorials.com/hacks/community-service/#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>John Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmututorials.com/?p=289#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>excellent job, can&#039;t wait to test it out this weekend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent job, can&#8217;t wait to test it out this weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://wpmututorials.com/hacks/community-service/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmututorials.com/?p=289#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>sounds like a step in the right direction to me.  I&#039;d like to not see wpmu go by the way side thats for sure.  But I think there are several ups to just plain wordpress when you have a smaller number of users, but the scalable features of wpmu are great as well when the site gets large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds like a step in the right direction to me.  I&#8217;d like to not see wpmu go by the way side thats for sure.  But I think there are several ups to just plain wordpress when you have a smaller number of users, but the scalable features of wpmu are great as well when the site gets large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Code merge experiment - WordPress Tavern Forum</title>
		<link>http://wpmututorials.com/hacks/community-service/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>Code merge experiment - WordPress Tavern Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmututorials.com/?p=289#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>[...] it would be to merge codebases for WPMU &amp; WP. And it turned out it was easier than it seems.   http://wpmututorials.com/hacks/community-service/  There&#039;s some experimental code, a hack of MU if you will, where you can even use an existing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it would be to merge codebases for WPMU &amp; WP. And it turned out it was easier than it seems.   <a href="http://wpmututorials.com/hacks/community-service/" rel="nofollow">http://wpmututorials.com/hacks/community-service/</a>  There&#8217;s some experimental code, a hack of MU if you will, where you can even use an existing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

